Apple Watch will begin tomorrow, April 10 on line reservation, then even if we can’t afford it or you can go to the Apple store in the demo for a while. But before that, part of the tech media at home and abroad have been given Apple Watch, and try out a period of time. Let us take a look at each of the post-Steve Jobs what’s new products.
Early see zhī xià, each home media on Apple Watch of evaluation are was optimistic, like times of evaluation people Farhad Manjoo on said, he very Italian this paragraph equipment; The Verge is think this will is first paragraph can became mainstream products of can wear equipment; and Bo Peng She is evaluation said, with after you must will wants to buy a Apple Watch, it is currently can buy to of best of can wear equipment.
But if you look at evaluation, will find that these people are the velvet glove, everywhere, in pointing out the weakness of this new Apple products.
Bloomberg: it’s not a good watch
Considered by Bloomberg notification feature will break other things you do, like when you’re in a meeting, will continue to receive a raise, messages, microblogging and other information, which speak of commitment to keep us focused on doing things completely different. So, if the person is an information overload, even if Apple can’t help you Watch filters.
More immediate is that they believe that Apple Watch are not the players table. Watch the most important function is to look at the time, but at least on Apple Watch, only if it “thinks” you look at the time, it only displays the time, and wanted to make it satisfactory, but it is a matter of luck.
The Verge: slower
The Verge believes that watch is running very slow, although it has a nice interface and some potentially useful features, but you still can’t notice it while in use sluggish speed.
In addition, playing music, Apple add a Watch may not be iPod nano watch band, able to display music information of the latter, but the former is not. world cup iPad Air case
Apple Watch one more important function is to quickly reply to a message, which is promised by the many similar products, but to completely throw away your cell phone information back and forth, and only exist in science fiction, reserved information is totally unable to meet design needs.
If you buy Apple Watch because of the fitness needs, it may be disappointed, it is an expensive exercise Tracker, certainly better than similar products, but nothing more, does not stand out.
The New York Times: technology white walked away
New York Times straight, it believed that the Apple iPhone and iPad and Watch different, it is not prepared for the sci-tech small white, in the first use, you have to play with for a while, to understand its interaction mode then you have to spend several days to understand it will in your life and what they do. world cup iPad Air case
In their view, Apple Watch, like any first generation product, not perfect, with so many defects.
In addition, the New York Times also noted that, most exciting Apple Watch is not the equipment itself, but it shows the vision for the technology, it may be the first accepted by the mainstream market for wearable devices. Of course, what this evaluation is senior black.
In addition, Apple Watch biggest role is to process information directly on the wrist, no phone, but it’s input is limited to preset words and expressions, as well as information that can be drawn, and this information requires a slight change, its ambition. As the New York Times said that “rough broke our dream of new products. “If you expect to enter text using a virtual assistant Siri, just say it, using it to complete the task probably depends on your luck.
And, as with The Verge of feeling, watch function is not very perfect, like Uber application met conditions that cannot be loaded, other applications are not easy to operate design, but some applications will automatically delete themselves, it is really strange.
The Wall Street Journal: to buy the next generation
Joanna Stern of the Wall Street Journal, said she will tell her friends, such as next-generation products out before you buy it.
Of course, her assessment was not bad, she thinks Apple Watch, Apple isn’t a wrist computer, but the “look” and “cool”, etc, just happen to have some computer functions. In other words, Apple Watch function is not satisfactory, “many features you can’t find”. Maybe Apple quite satisfied with the result, because of its positioning of fashions for watches, like Apple’s products, watches are a status symbol, reflecting the user’s taste and wealth.
When comparing with other health tracking devices, Stern said that similar equipment will soon be abandoned, eating dust in the corner, but Apple Watch not because it not only more accurate, and it would be a parts that makes people want to wear throughout the day. Maybe we can translate this word: Apple Watch is fashionable (and expensive), you won’t make it in the corner eating grey please?
If you want to summarise all about Apple Watch survey, Foreign Media Inc of evaluation may be best suited for the Web site: Apple wearable device Watch is the best, but it’s too expensive, and not a necessity.
However, this may not be a problem for Apple. When the first generation of the iPad comes out, a lot of people judging it the same way. Perhaps only die-hard powder will now buy Apple Watch, but Apple certainly will continue to escalate, next year’s assessment may not be the same again.
In addition, many media considered Apple wearable device Watch is the best, that is to say, if it had any defects or defect for the industry will be. Development of wearable devices are now trapped in technology, not to force such as battery, voice input is not accurate, or too reliant on mobile phone. But what is wrong is the entire industry, not an Apple.